返回

高中二年级英语

首页
  • 阅读理解
    阅读理解
    Ban Fur? Then Why Not Leather?
    Much to the displeasure of some local businesses, the City Council in West Hollywood, California,
    voted without opposition last week to ban the sale of fur products. Should laws be involved in this issue? Is it unfair to ban sales of fur, but not sales of leather and hides (兽皮)?
    Animals Do Not Have Rights
    By Tibor R. Machan
    My view is that animals do not have basic rights. It is a matter of ethics (伦理学) and not of the laws of human societies. If animals had such rights as human beings do, they would have to be held responsible for killing fellow animals in the wild. That way of thinking about animals makes a category mistake. Using
    animals, including their fur or organs, to improve people's lives is acceptable.
    A Small Step Against Cruelty
    By Kate Carter
    Both fur and leather are the skins of dead animals. Why should we think that the lovable furry ones
    deserve more of a life than the less pleasing ones? Some say leather is  less cruel because it's a byproduct (副产品) of the meat industry. But this isn't really true. Some cheap leather may be a byproduct of the
    meat industry, but often it's the other way round. In South Africa, where there is a developing market for
    ostrich(鸵鸟)farms, the skins account for roughly 80 percent of the slaughtered (宰杀)birds' value, a mere 20 percent of which comes from the meat.
    "Who" Are You Wearing?
    By Marc Bekoff
    West Hollywood's ban is a move in the right direction. However, we must work to ban the sales of
    leather and hides, too. Furs come from animals who are attacked to become clothing, while some leather
    and hides come from slaughterhouse(屠宰场) animals. We must remember that when people choose to
    wear fur, leather and hides, they are wearing formering conscious beings. So it's a matter of who they are wearing, not what they are wearing because these animals must be referred to as who and not what or that.
    1. What is the passage mainly about?
    A. West Hollywood's ban on fur products.
    B. Differences between fur and leather sales.
    C. The government's role in protecting animals.
    D. The ecological imbalance in West Hollywood.
    2. Tibor R. Machan seems to believe that_____.
    A. laws should be passed to protect animals
    B. humans are respornsible for killing animals
    C. it is not reasonable to use animals to improve life
    D. animals and humans aren't supposed to share equal rights
    3. What is Kate Carter's opinion about wearing fur and wearing leather?
    A. Both are decided by the meat industry.
    B. There is little distinction (区别) between them.
    C. Wearing fur is generally more acceptable.
    D. Wearing leather is cheaper than wearing fur.
    4. What is Marc Bekoff's attitude towards sales of fur?
    A. Sympathetic.
    B. Careless.
    C. Tolerant.
    D. Opposed.
    本题信息:2012年福建省期末题英语阅读理解难度极难 来源:张连飘(高中英语)
  • 本题答案
    查看答案
本试题 “阅读理解Ban Fur? Then Why Not Leather?Much to the displeasure of some local businesses, the City Council in West Hollywood, California,voted withou...” 主要考查您对

社会现象类阅读

等考点的理解。关于这些考点您可以点击下面的选项卡查看详细档案。
  • 社会现象类阅读

社会现象类阅读概念:

这类文章通过写人记事来揭示文章的主题,显示其社会意义,一般采用顺序或倒叙来叙述。题目经常是一些细节问题。考查的方面可以是原因和其中引发的思考。


社会现象类阅读解题技巧:

这类文章通过写人记事来揭示文章的主题,显示其社会意义,一般采用顺序或倒叙来叙述。题目经常是一些细节问题。考查的方面可以是原因和其中引发的思考。阅读这类文章要理清思路。
1、浏览试题,明确要求。
      在阅读文章前,最好先浏览一下文章后面的题干和选项。知道了问题后再去看文章,可使思路更敏捷,而且也便于阅读时留意文中出现的与选项有关的信息。   
2、通读全文,抓住主要内容。
      在不影响理解的前提下,尽可能地阅读以便在尽可能短的时间内理解文章或段落的内容。阅读时,如遇到不熟悉的单词、词组或一时看不懂的句子,不要停下来苦思冥想,继续读下去,通过上下文的词语和句子可能就理解了。   
3、抓住中心思想和段落大意。
      通读全文时,要特别注意主题句。每篇文章或每个段落都有与文章有关的句子,尤其是科技、政论性文章的主题句一般都在文章的开头或结尾,插在中间的很少。所以,文章的第一段或开头的第一、二个句子往往包含着文章的中心思想、作者的意图或全文的概述,因此要特别注意,彻底理解。   
4、有针对性地仔细阅读,找寻所需信息。
      在前面的基础上,可进行有针对性地阅读了。把与问题无关的内容一扫而过,而对于和问题有关的内容认真阅读,还可以用笔在下面做出记号。再把这些信息与问题的要求结合起来,逐条分析,综合判断,找出正确答案。   
5、进行合理的推理判断。
      对文章有了全面的了解之后,可以按照文章要求以及上下文之间的关系,做出推理判断。在进行推理判断的时候,需要综合考虑句型、语法、句子之间的逻辑关系、文化背景等方面的因素。   
6、认真复读,验证答案。
      要用全文的中心思想统帅各个题目,研究其内在联系和逻辑关系,并依次审核那些还未打上的题目,确保理解无误。