返回

高中三年级英语

首页
  • 阅读理解
    阅读理解。
    Working as a manager in the head office of a bank, as I do, clothes can be a nightmare. In
    New York, where I worked for a time last summer, you have to brave the burning heat every
    time you dare to go outside, yet freeze once you arrive in a meeting with the air-conditioner
    turned up. I struggled to know what to wear. The problem was worsened by the office dress
    code for the months of July and August, which was "dress-down".
    The dress-down phenomenon seems to have begun in places where staff work through the
    terrible heat of summer while their families take shelter at the coast or in the hills. Dress-down,
    limited to Friday, allows staff to head straight for their out-of-town places on Friday evenings
    without going home to change. But in New York it has now become a week-round state of
    affairs. This move may have been born out of consideration; to allow people on Wall Street to
    travel to work in the heat in something more comfortable than a suit, but the effect is less kind.
    For me, dress-down is bad for two reasons. The first is that it actually requires a whole new
    wardrobe. For my male colleagues in the US, it seemed to mean a switch from one uniform to
    another. I basically only own two types of clothes; suits for working in and truly casual clothes
    for relaxing weekends in the countryside.
    Returning to London, I was therefore rather embarrassed to discover that my employers had
    started summer dress-down. Here too, though its relevance to the climate is far from immediately
    apparent. At first, I tried to sidestep it by simply turning up in my suit as usual, but my staff
    complained that they then felt pressured into doing the same. So, I found myself having to buy "
    smart casual" clothes specifically to wear to work; a ridiculous expense.
    Even more annoying is the fact that I'm still required to have a suit hanging up in my office in
    case I'm suddenly called to a meeting on our conference floor, where dress-down is banned for
    fear that a client should witness it. One of my colleagues started to accumulate more and more
    very smart suits in her office, explaining that she was having her flat renovated and that in-office
    wardrobe was a necessity as she was staying at a different friend's place each night. We weren't
    convinced.
    For the other great inconvenience of dress-down for the staff is that it makes it easier than
    ever to spot when colleagues are going to job interviews. For the rest of the year, it is easy enough
    to arrange these during the working week, but in the summer when dress-down rules, it's a dead
    giveawayto arrive in overly smart clothes and then go out for a "dental appointment". I would
    normally applaud this state of affairs, as an important part of my time is spent trying to prevent
    valued employees from moving elsewhere, and any clues about their intentions are helpful and
    allow me to nip things in the bud(消灭于萌芽中).
    However, the clothes hanging in my office are now finding a second use. I have suddenly
    become the target for several "headhunters", people employed by other companies to try and
    attract employees away with offers of better pay and conditions. The only problem with this is
    that I have just the one suit at the office. As a series of interviews with one future employer
    progresses, I'm having to bring in additional clothes. I can hardly present myself as a highly-paid
    investment banker, requiring a vast salary, if they only ever see me in one suit. At this rate, I shall
    have to tell my staff that I, too, have decided to have my flat done up.
    1. According to the writer, "dress-down" in New York began as a way of ______.
    A. making life easier for staff in the summer months
    B. discouraging staff from taking summer holidays
    C. showing concern for staff who lived out of town
    D. rewarding those employees willing to work in the heat
    2. What was the writer's first reaction to the idea of " dress-down" in her London office?
    A. She argued against it.
    B. She attempted to ignore it.
    C. She recognized the need for it.
    D. She persuaded her staff to adopt it.
    3. Why does " dress-down" annoy the writer?
    A. Not everyone obeys the rule.
    B. Her clients find it embarrassing.
    C. It does not apply on all occasions.
    D. The clothes themselves do not suit her.
    4. In which aspect of her work does the writer find "dress-down" an advantage?
    A. Training new members of staff.
    B. Providing her staff with some information.
    C. Making sure that her staff remain faithful.
    D. Making her staff feel more comfortable at work.
    5. The underlined word "giveaway" in the sixth paragraph means_________.
    A. something that is given away free.
    B. willingness to stop doing something.
    C. willingness to give away to the other's wishes.
    本题信息:2012年浙江省期中题英语阅读理解难度较难 来源:谢雪莲
  • 本题答案
    查看答案
本试题 “阅读理解。Working as a manager in the head office of a bank, as I do, clothes can be a nightmare. InNew York, where I worked for a time last summer...” 主要考查您对

日常生活类阅读

等考点的理解。关于这些考点您可以点击下面的选项卡查看详细档案。
  • 日常生活类阅读

日常生活类阅读的概念:

日常生活这一话题主要涉及人们衣食住行等方面的活动。这一话题的选材主要针对人们日常的工作,生活以及学习情况。做这一类题时,最主要的是要把握好人物的活动内容,时间和地点。


日常生活类阅读题答题技巧:

【题型说明】
该类文章内容涉及到人们的言谈举止、生活习惯、饮食起居、服饰仪表、恋爱婚姻、消遣娱乐、节日起源、家庭生活等。文章篇幅短小,追根溯源,探索各项风俗的历史渊源,内容有趣。命题也以送分题为主,如事实细节题、语义转换题、词义猜测题和简单推理判断题等。虽然这类文章读起来感觉轻松,试题做起来比较顺手,但绝不能掉以轻心。因为稍不留神,就会丢分。   
【备考提醒】
为了保证较高准确率,建议同学们做好以下几点:   
1、保持正常的考试心态。笔者在教学中发现,越是容易的试题,同学们越是容易失分。为什么呢?因为在这种情况下,同学们极易产生麻痹思想,认为题目好做,就不引起高度重视,于是思维不发散、不周密。而命题人就是利用同学们的这一弱点,设计陷阱题。所以,无论试题难易与否,我们都要保持正常的考试心态。试题容易,不欣喜;试题难,不悲观。   
2、根据前面讲到的方法,认认真真、细细心心做好事实细节题。   
3、做好语义转换题。这类题是根据英语中一词多义和某些词语在文中能表达一定的修辞意义的原则而设计的。要求同学们解释某生词的含义,确定多义词或短语在文中的意思,确认文中的某个代词所指代的对象,或者对英语中特有的表达、格言、谚语进行解释。这种题要求同学们一定要根据上下文猜测词义或理解句子,切不可望文生义。   
4、做好简单推理判断题。简单推理判断题要以表面文字为前提,以具体事实为依据进行推理,做出判断。这种推理方式比较直接,只要弄清事实,即可结合常识推断出合理的结论。