返回

高中二年级英语

首页
  • 阅读理解
    If you give something to someone for free, will that person value it and use it? Development experts have debated this question for decades. Some think the act of paying causes people to value something and use it more.
    Selling necessary health treatments, others argue, may deny them to the people who need them the most.
    Consider, for example, chemically treated bed nets, which kill mosquitoes anti protect people against malaria(疟疾)while they are sleeping. William Easterly, an economist at New York University, believes this is one example of development having gone wrong. In a recent book, Professor Easterly suggests bed nets given free in Africa are often used for the wrong purpose. Yet, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends bed nets be given out free and used by whole communities. The success of a large free bed net campaign in Kenya led the WHO to announce this recommendation
    This debate will likely influence social programs in the developing world. Many non-governmental organizations support the creation of self-supporting programs in poor countries. Goods and services are sold for a price to help these programs survive.
    According to Rachel Glenerster, who runs a research lab doing development and poverty studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, her several studies have proven that small price changes have a big influence on the number of people who use a product. A price change will reduce the total amount of use of the product as well, she says. She has also found no evidence that the very act of paying for something changes how people use it.
    As for a particular product among special populations, some development experts argue that pricing is useful. When it comes to bed nets, Miss Glenerster says research shows no evidence of this. People are just as likely to use a bed net whether they paid for it or not.
    小题1: The debate among experts focuses on      .
    A.a special use of bed nets in Africa
    B.the use of assistance-related products
    C.the importance of social programs for the poor
    D.a popular way to help the poor
    小题2: According to some experts, certain health treatments       .
    A.can only be sold to the richB.should be completely free
    C.are too expensiveD.are not needed by the poor
    小题3:What can be inferred from Paragraph 2?
    A.The WHO's advice may not be always practical.
    B.Many Africans don't know the function of bed nets.
    C.The case of Kenya is doubtful.
    D.Bed nets given to Africans are poor in quality.
    小题4: What may be the possible change in the social program according to the third paragraph?
    A.Some of them may become financially independent.
    B.Many of them will not be organized by the government.
    C.Some of them will go to developed countries.
    D.Most of them will be free of charge.

    本题信息:英语阅读理解难度一般 来源:未知
  • 本题答案
    查看答案
本试题 “If you give something to someone for free, will that person value it and use it? Development experts have debated this question for decades. Some t...” 主要考查您对

健康环保类阅读

等考点的理解。关于这些考点您可以点击下面的选项卡查看详细档案。
  • 健康环保类阅读

健康环保累阅读概念:

健康环保类文章常是介绍科学知识、生活常识和环境保护方面的短文。体裁有记叙文、 说明文、议论文和各种应用文。


健康环保类文章阅读技巧:

       健康环保类文章常是介绍科学知识、生活常识和环境保护方面的短文。阅读此类短文要以现象或事物为中心进行思考,理解现象产生的原因、条件和客观规律等。同时要抓住事物的特征、用途和相互关系等。科普环保类文章一般为说明文,从结构上看大致可分为三个部分:
       第一部分一般是文章的首段,主要用来提出文章的主题,即文章想要阐述、说明的主要内容;
       第二部分是文章的主体,可由若干个段落组成,对文章的主题进行展开说明;
       第三部分是结尾段,对文章的主题进行归纳总结。这类文章多用一般现在时,而且一般多使用客观性词语表述。有时为了强调客观性,也常使用被动语态。
       从近几年的考试题来看,科普环保类的文章越来越与人们的实际生活相接近。由于此类文章缺乏故事情节,很多同学对此类文章感到费解。但一般的科普类文章都是就事论事,需要逻辑推理和想象的时候较少,因此此类阅读题也没有同学们想象中的那么难,只要多加训练,就能较好地答题。
【阅读策略】
1、概要(Summarizing):
      阅完材料后,将所阅材料浓缩,摘要,做出所阅材料的书面或口头梗概。
2、组织(Organization):
      阅读后根据阅读内容,识别观点、人物、事件之间的关系以及文章的结构关系。如:时间关系、比较或对比关系、相关关系及因果关系等。