返回

高中二年级英语

首页
  • 阅读理解
    阅读理解
    Was he dreaming? David Ewart saw a red ball of fire. He shot out of a deep sleep and heard his
    ten-year-old daughter, Heather, screaming. Ewart jumped out of bed on the second floor of  his home.
    Downstairs he heard loud popping noises, glass bulbs, furniture, appliances exploding as fire consumed
    them.
    Three hundred and fifty people, including friends and family members, had attended Ewart's annual
    Christmas party at his home in Valencia, California. David was a giver. They all enjoyed
    themselves. After the party, he and his 77-year-old mother, Esther, put out the candles all but one,
    missed and left burning on a holiday paper tablecloth.
    Now, as Ewart started down the hall to alert his parents and three children, he said a silent
    prayer: God, if it is your will, save us. The heat was hellish(地狱般的). But then he felt a hand on his
    shoulder and something that was not quite a voice guiding him, giving him the direction: the bedroom
    window.
    He kicked out the window screen and told Heather to jump onto the patio(院子) cover, crawl
    to the edge and drop to the ground, the feet below. Next he headed for his two sons, Jonathan, 13,
    and Michael, 15, who were screaming with pain. David led Jonathan to the window. He returned for
    Michael, who was now helping his grandparents, trapped in their room behind a jammed door.
    Michael threw himself against it and finally burst through. David guided his mother, then Michael,
    to safety.
    Only his father remained. The 81-year-old's face was badly burned. He lost his footing and fell.
    David took his hand and helped him to the window. Too weak to hold on, his father rolled off the
    patio cover to the ground.
    Finally,David escaped. Second later, the second floor exploded, yet all the while, he felt he was
    being led, under protection. The family survived and firefighters said they were mystified(迷惑) as to
    how the family survived. David Ewart was not..
    1. Why did the fire take place?
    A. Three hundred and fifty friends were at their home.
    B. David and his mother put out all the candles but one left burning.
    C. Someone set fire to their house.
    D. David Ewart saw a red ball of fire.
    2. Which is the following is Not true?
    A. Michael helped his parents escape from the fire.
    B. David Ewart helped heather jumped out of the burning room from the bedroom window.
    C. David's father was too weak to hold on , at last he was dead.
    D. David's mother was saved out earlier than his father.
    3. How many years older was David's father than his mother?
    A. 2
    B.15
    C. 4
    D. the same age
    4. How many people were trapped when the fire broke out?
    A. 350
    B. 6
    C. 5
    D. 356
    5. What does the writer want to tell us from the story?
    A. Everyone should be aware of the danger of fire
    B. People shouldn't hold big parties at home
    C. United, we stand, Divided, we fall.
    D. When in danger, we should keep calm.
    本题信息:2012年同步题英语阅读理解难度较难 来源:张梅梅
  • 本题答案
    查看答案
本试题 “阅读理解Was he dreaming? David Ewart saw a red ball of fire. He shot out of a deep sleep and heard histen-year-old daughter, Heather, screaming. Ew...” 主要考查您对

故事类阅读

等考点的理解。关于这些考点您可以点击下面的选项卡查看详细档案。
  • 故事类阅读

故事类阅读概念:

这类文章一般描述的是某一件具体事情的发生发展或结局,有人物、时间、地点和事件。命题往往从故事的情节、人物或事件的之间的关系、作者的态度及意图、故事前因和后果的推测等方面着手,考查学生对细节的辨认能力以及推理判断能力。


故事类阅读应试技巧:

1、抓住文章的6个要素:
阅读时要学会从事情本身的发展去理解故事情节而不要只看事件在文中出现的先后顺序。因此,无论是顺叙还是倒叙,阅读此类文章时,必须要找到它结构中的5个W(when, where, who, why, what)和1个H(how),不过不是每篇都会完整地交待六个要素。毫无疑问,寻出这些元素是能够正确快速解题的一个先决条件。
2、注意作者的议论和抒情:
高考英语阅读理解故事类文章常伴随着作者思想情感的流露和表达,因此议论和抒情往往夹杂其中。行文时或按事情发生发展的先后时间进行或按事情发生发展的地点来转换,也可能按事情发展的阶段来布局。在引出话题,讲完一件事情后,作者往往会表达个人感悟或提出建议等。这些体现作者观点或思想的语句在阅读时可以划线,它们往往体现文章中心或者写作意图,属于必考点,所以要仔细体会。
3、结合前两点归纳文章中心,把握作者态度:
故事类文章是通过记叙一件事来表达中心思想的,它是文章的灵魂。归纳文章中心思想时,尤其要分析文章的结尾,因为很多文章卒章显志,用简短的议论、抒情揭示文章中心;文章中议论抒情的句子往往与中心密切相关;也有的文章需要在结合概括各段大意的基础上归纳中心。另外,叙述一件事必有其目的,或阐明某一观点,或赞美某种品德,或抨击某种陋习,这就要求我们在阅读时,通过对细节(第1点中的六要素)的理解,把握作者的态度。
4、有章有据进行解题判断:
分析文章,归纳主题,属于分析、概括、综合的表述能力的考查。切忌脱离文章,架空分析,一定让分析在文章中有依据。