返回

高中一年级英语

首页
  • 阅读理解
    阅读理解。
    Trait was an experienced safecracker who never used force -either against people or safes
    (保险箱). He was a real artist of his trade and it took him only 19 minutes to open the most
    difficult safe he had ever encountered. In about 10 years, helped by his brother Stefan and two
    friends, he took about $330,000 -from the safes of 28 banks in Austria. On his last job, early
    in 1999, he left the safe door open and $80,000 behind. With the money was a note, "We don’t
    need all that much."
    A witness (目击者) recognized his car and Strait was caught by the police. Then he was
    sent to Austria’s Stein Prison to serve a six-year sentence. He boasted (吹嘘) at his trial that
    he would continue breaking the law, "I am a thief and I shall use every opportunity." Despite
    the warning, prison officials moved Strait to the prison’s blacksmith (铁匠) shop. One day during
    the week before Christmas, Strait disappeared. Searchers found all his doors were well locked.
    Strait had managed to make a set of keys and let himself out.
    Not to freedom, though. After crossing into Bavaria, Strait attracted the suspicion (怀疑) of
    German customs police on purpose and got himself arrested. "I want to be in a German prison,
    "he explained to the surprised police. "As German courts give much milder (温和的) sentences
    for crimes like mine and will reduce the time I would otherwise have served in Stein Prison."
    In prison, Strait persuaded his keepers to let him make a Christmas Eve telephone call to his
    former keeper, Karl Schreiner of Stein Prison. "I’m sorry if I caused trouble. I didn’t want to
    embarrass anybody by escaping. Conditions weren’t that bad. In fact the food was better than
    it is here."
    1. The underlined word "safecracker" in the first paragraph means "_________".
    A. prisoner
    B. criminal
    C. stealer
    D. Robber
    2. What’s the correct order of the following events?______
    a. Strait was caught by German customs police.
    b. Strait left a note in the bank.
    c. Strait was sent to Stein Prison.
    d. Strait worked in a blacksmith shop.
    e. Strait escaped from prison.
    A. d-b-a-c-e
    B. b-a-c-d-e
    C. b-c-d-e-a
    D. d-b-c-e-a
    3. What helped Strait escape from prison? ______
    A. His living alone in prison.
    B. His good relations with the prison officials.
    C. His cooperation with other prisoners.
    D. His working in the blacksmith shop.
    4. Strait was finally caught because _______.
    A. his car was recognized by someone
    B. he left a note in the bank safe
    C. he was recognized by customs police
    D. he made a phone call to his former keeper
    5. Strait preferred to serve his time in Germany because _______.
    A. he hated working in the blacksmith shop in the Austrian prison
    B. the life of prisoners in Germany was better than those in Austria’s
    C. he wouldn’t have to stay that long in a German prison
    D. he could escape more easily from a German prison
    本题信息:2012年同步题英语阅读理解难度较难 来源:王振兴
  • 本题答案
    查看答案
本试题 “阅读理解。Trait was an experienced safecracker who never used force -either against people or safes(保险箱). He was a real artist of his trade and ...” 主要考查您对

故事类阅读

等考点的理解。关于这些考点您可以点击下面的选项卡查看详细档案。
  • 故事类阅读

故事类阅读概念:

这类文章一般描述的是某一件具体事情的发生发展或结局,有人物、时间、地点和事件。命题往往从故事的情节、人物或事件的之间的关系、作者的态度及意图、故事前因和后果的推测等方面着手,考查学生对细节的辨认能力以及推理判断能力。


故事类阅读应试技巧:

1、抓住文章的6个要素:
阅读时要学会从事情本身的发展去理解故事情节而不要只看事件在文中出现的先后顺序。因此,无论是顺叙还是倒叙,阅读此类文章时,必须要找到它结构中的5个W(when, where, who, why, what)和1个H(how),不过不是每篇都会完整地交待六个要素。毫无疑问,寻出这些元素是能够正确快速解题的一个先决条件。
2、注意作者的议论和抒情:
高考英语阅读理解故事类文章常伴随着作者思想情感的流露和表达,因此议论和抒情往往夹杂其中。行文时或按事情发生发展的先后时间进行或按事情发生发展的地点来转换,也可能按事情发展的阶段来布局。在引出话题,讲完一件事情后,作者往往会表达个人感悟或提出建议等。这些体现作者观点或思想的语句在阅读时可以划线,它们往往体现文章中心或者写作意图,属于必考点,所以要仔细体会。
3、结合前两点归纳文章中心,把握作者态度:
故事类文章是通过记叙一件事来表达中心思想的,它是文章的灵魂。归纳文章中心思想时,尤其要分析文章的结尾,因为很多文章卒章显志,用简短的议论、抒情揭示文章中心;文章中议论抒情的句子往往与中心密切相关;也有的文章需要在结合概括各段大意的基础上归纳中心。另外,叙述一件事必有其目的,或阐明某一观点,或赞美某种品德,或抨击某种陋习,这就要求我们在阅读时,通过对细节(第1点中的六要素)的理解,把握作者的态度。
4、有章有据进行解题判断:
分析文章,归纳主题,属于分析、概括、综合的表述能力的考查。切忌脱离文章,架空分析,一定让分析在文章中有依据。