返回

高中三年级英语

首页
  • 阅读理解
    阅读理解。

         Getting rid of dirt, in the opinion of most people, is a good thing. However, there is nothing fixed about
    attitudes to dirt.
         In the early 16th century, people thought that dirt on the skin was a means to block out disease, as medical
    opinion had it that washing off dirt with hot water could open up the skin and let ills in. A particular danger
    was thought to lie in public baths. By 1538, the French king had closed the bath houses in his kingdom. So
    did the king of England in 1546. Thus began a long time when the rich and the poor in Europe lived with dirt
    in a friendly way. Henry IV, King of France, was famously dirty. Upon learning that a nobleman had taken a
    bath, the king ordered that, to avoid the attack of disease, the nobleman should not go out.
         Though the belief in the merit of dirt was long-lived, dirt has no longer been regarded as a nice neighbor
    ever since the 18th century. Scientifically speaking, cleaning away dirt is good to health. Clean water supply
    and hand washing are practical means of preventing disease. Yet, it seems that standards of cleanliness have
    moved beyond science since World War Ⅱ. Advertisements repeatedly sell the idea; clothes need to be whiter
    than white, cloths ever softer, surfaces to shine. Has the hate for dirt, however, gone too far?
         Attitudes to dirt still differ hugely nowadays. Many first-time parents nervously try to warn their children
    off touching dirt, which might be responsible for the spread of disease. On the contrary, Mary Ruebush, an
    American immunologist (免疫学家), encourages children to play in the dirt to build up a strong immune
    system. And the latter position is gaining some ground.


    1. The kings of France and England in the 16th century closed bath houses because _____.
    A. they lived healthily in a dirty environment
    B. they thought bath houses were to dirty to stay in
    C. they believed disease could be spread in public baths
    D. they considered bathing as the cause of skin disease
    2. Which of the following best describes Henry IV's attitude to bathing?
    A. Afraid
    B. Curious
    C. Approving
    D. Uninterested
    3. How does the passage mainly develop?
    A. By providing examples.
    B. By making comparisons.
    C. By following the order of time.
    D. By following the order of importance.
    4. What is the author's purpose in writing the passage?
    A. To stress the role of dirt.
    B. To introduce the history of dirt.
    C. To call attention to the danger of dirt.
    D. To present the change of views on dirt.
    本题信息:2011年重庆市高考真题英语阅读理解难度极难 来源:张雪
  • 本题答案
    查看答案
本试题 “阅读理解。 Getting rid of dirt, in the opinion of most people, is a good thing. However, there is nothing fixed aboutattitudes to dirt. In the earl...” 主要考查您对

健康环保类阅读

等考点的理解。关于这些考点您可以点击下面的选项卡查看详细档案。
  • 健康环保类阅读

健康环保累阅读概念:

健康环保类文章常是介绍科学知识、生活常识和环境保护方面的短文。体裁有记叙文、 说明文、议论文和各种应用文。


健康环保类文章阅读技巧:

       健康环保类文章常是介绍科学知识、生活常识和环境保护方面的短文。阅读此类短文要以现象或事物为中心进行思考,理解现象产生的原因、条件和客观规律等。同时要抓住事物的特征、用途和相互关系等。科普环保类文章一般为说明文,从结构上看大致可分为三个部分:
       第一部分一般是文章的首段,主要用来提出文章的主题,即文章想要阐述、说明的主要内容;
       第二部分是文章的主体,可由若干个段落组成,对文章的主题进行展开说明;
       第三部分是结尾段,对文章的主题进行归纳总结。这类文章多用一般现在时,而且一般多使用客观性词语表述。有时为了强调客观性,也常使用被动语态。
       从近几年的考试题来看,科普环保类的文章越来越与人们的实际生活相接近。由于此类文章缺乏故事情节,很多同学对此类文章感到费解。但一般的科普类文章都是就事论事,需要逻辑推理和想象的时候较少,因此此类阅读题也没有同学们想象中的那么难,只要多加训练,就能较好地答题。
【阅读策略】
1、概要(Summarizing):
      阅完材料后,将所阅材料浓缩,摘要,做出所阅材料的书面或口头梗概。
2、组织(Organization):
      阅读后根据阅读内容,识别观点、人物、事件之间的关系以及文章的结构关系。如:时间关系、比较或对比关系、相关关系及因果关系等。