返回

高中三年级英语

首页
  • 阅读理解
    阅读理解。
    Schools are still free to pass the potato. On Tuesday, the U.S. Senate voted to block a proposal (提议) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) would have limited the amount of potatoes and other
    starchy(富含淀粉的) vegetables served in schools. And those vegetables high in carbohydrates (碳水化合物) would also have been banned from school breakfast. The USDA had
    wanted to make the changes to the federal school lunch program.
    The Senate's amendment (修正案) blocks the USDA from putting any limits on amount of
    servings of potatoes or other vegetables in school lunches. Senator Susan Collins of Maine, a
    potato-growing state, supported amendment. "USDA's proposed rule would have put significant and
    needless costs on our nation's school districts at a time when they can least afford it," Collins said.
    Those in favor of potato limit say that children get enough potatoes already and should be encouraged
    to try other vegetables. The centre for science in the Public Interest pushed for the
    restrictions. "USDA's proposal was about helping kids to eat a very wide variety of vegetables, and I think that opinion has been lost in all this," said the Center's Margo Wootan, "Other vegetables have a hard time competing with potatoes."
    The proposed change upset potato growers, who believed potatoes were being unfairly targeted.
    Some schools have criticized the USDA's attempt to tell them exactly what foods they can or can't
    serve. Critics say the USDA should focus on advising schools on how to prepare the potato instead.
    Potatoes can be  a  good  source  of fiber.  Many  schools already prepare French fries with less
    grease (油脂) and serve potatoes in healthier ways.
    The USDA is expected to release a final list of guidelines for the federal school lunch program next
    year. Senator Mark Udall of Colorado, another potato-growing state, also supported the amendment that blocked the potato limit. "This amendment seeks to ensure flexibility for schools to provide nutritious and
    affordable school meals." he said.
    1. What is the content of the proposal put forward by the USDA?
    A. Reducing the amount of starch vegetables served in schools.
    B. Reducing the amount of vegetables served in schools.
    C. Supporting serving potatoes in school.
    D. Stopping serving starchy vegetables in schools.
    2. One reason for blocking the proposal is that_                .
    A. the proposal will put needless costs on nation's school districts
    B. children who get enough other vegetables for children
    C. there aren't enough other vegetables for children
    D. other vegetables will have a hard time competing with potatoes.
    3. Who supports a potato limit according to the passage?
    A. Susan Collins
    B. Critics
    C. Margo Wootan
    D. Mark Udall
    4. What's the main idea of the passage?
    A. Food supplies in America affect students.
    B. Potatoes served in school will be limited.
    C. A project on the students' health is carried out.
    D. A proposal is blocked by the U.S. Senate
    本题信息:2012年安徽省模拟题英语阅读理解难度较难 来源:刘婷婷
  • 本题答案
    查看答案
本试题 “阅读理解。Schools are still free to pass the potato. On Tuesday, the U.S. Senate voted to block a proposal (提议) by the U.S. Department of Agricul...” 主要考查您对

日常生活类阅读

等考点的理解。关于这些考点您可以点击下面的选项卡查看详细档案。
  • 日常生活类阅读

日常生活类阅读的概念:

日常生活这一话题主要涉及人们衣食住行等方面的活动。这一话题的选材主要针对人们日常的工作,生活以及学习情况。做这一类题时,最主要的是要把握好人物的活动内容,时间和地点。


日常生活类阅读题答题技巧:

【题型说明】
该类文章内容涉及到人们的言谈举止、生活习惯、饮食起居、服饰仪表、恋爱婚姻、消遣娱乐、节日起源、家庭生活等。文章篇幅短小,追根溯源,探索各项风俗的历史渊源,内容有趣。命题也以送分题为主,如事实细节题、语义转换题、词义猜测题和简单推理判断题等。虽然这类文章读起来感觉轻松,试题做起来比较顺手,但绝不能掉以轻心。因为稍不留神,就会丢分。   
【备考提醒】
为了保证较高准确率,建议同学们做好以下几点:   
1、保持正常的考试心态。笔者在教学中发现,越是容易的试题,同学们越是容易失分。为什么呢?因为在这种情况下,同学们极易产生麻痹思想,认为题目好做,就不引起高度重视,于是思维不发散、不周密。而命题人就是利用同学们的这一弱点,设计陷阱题。所以,无论试题难易与否,我们都要保持正常的考试心态。试题容易,不欣喜;试题难,不悲观。   
2、根据前面讲到的方法,认认真真、细细心心做好事实细节题。   
3、做好语义转换题。这类题是根据英语中一词多义和某些词语在文中能表达一定的修辞意义的原则而设计的。要求同学们解释某生词的含义,确定多义词或短语在文中的意思,确认文中的某个代词所指代的对象,或者对英语中特有的表达、格言、谚语进行解释。这种题要求同学们一定要根据上下文猜测词义或理解句子,切不可望文生义。   
4、做好简单推理判断题。简单推理判断题要以表面文字为前提,以具体事实为依据进行推理,做出判断。这种推理方式比较直接,只要弄清事实,即可结合常识推断出合理的结论。