返回

高中三年级英语

首页
  • 阅读理解
    阅读理解。
    A German taxi-driver, Franz Bussman, recently found a brother who was thought to have been killed
    twenty years before.
    While on a walking tour with his wife, he stopped to talk to a workman. After they had gone on, Mrs
    Bussman commented on the workman's close resemblance to her husband and even suggested that he
    might be his brother. Franz poured scorn on the idea, pointing out that his brother had been killed in action
    during the war. Though Mrs. Bussman was fully acquainted with this story, she thought that there was a
    chance in a million that she might be right.
    A few days later, she sent a boy to the workman to ask him if his name was Hans Bussman, Needless
    to say, the man's name was Hans Bussman and he really was Franz's long-lost brother. When the brothers
    were re-united, Hans explained how it was that he was still alive.
    After having been wounded towards the end of the war, he had been sent to hospital and was separated
    from his unit. The hospital had been bombed and Hans had made his way back into Western Germany on
    foot. Meanwhile, his unit was lost and all records of him had been destroyed. Hans returned to his family
    home, but the house had been bombed and no one in the neighborhood knew what had become of the
    inhabitants. Assuming that his family had been killed during an air-raid (空袭), Hans settled down in a Village
    fifty miles away where he had remained ever since.
    1. Which of the following can be used as the best title of the passage?
    A. Living Not Far
    B. A Chance in a Million
    C. Coming Back to Life
    D. Back after the War
    2. Why did Franz laugh at his wife's idea?
    A. Because Franz believed that his brother had already been killed in the war.
    B. Because Franz believed that many people looked closely like his brother.
    C. Because Franz thought that his wife was just joking.
    D. Because Franz believed there was a chance in a million that the workman was his brother.
    3. Which of the following orders is right?
    a. He walked back to Western Germany.
    b. He was wounded when the war was coming to the end.
    c. The hospital was destroyed by bombs.
    d. He came back to his family house.
    e. He was sent to hospital. f. His unit of German didn't exist any longer.
    A. b,a,e,d,f,c
    B. b,e,c,a,f,d
    C. b,e,a,c,d,f
    D.b,c,f,d,a,e
    本题信息:2011年吉林省模拟题英语阅读理解难度较难 来源:张雪
  • 本题答案
    查看答案
本试题 “阅读理解。A German taxi-driver, Franz Bussman, recently found a brother who was thought to have been killedtwenty years before.While on a walking t...” 主要考查您对

故事类阅读

等考点的理解。关于这些考点您可以点击下面的选项卡查看详细档案。
  • 故事类阅读

故事类阅读概念:

这类文章一般描述的是某一件具体事情的发生发展或结局,有人物、时间、地点和事件。命题往往从故事的情节、人物或事件的之间的关系、作者的态度及意图、故事前因和后果的推测等方面着手,考查学生对细节的辨认能力以及推理判断能力。


故事类阅读应试技巧:

1、抓住文章的6个要素:
阅读时要学会从事情本身的发展去理解故事情节而不要只看事件在文中出现的先后顺序。因此,无论是顺叙还是倒叙,阅读此类文章时,必须要找到它结构中的5个W(when, where, who, why, what)和1个H(how),不过不是每篇都会完整地交待六个要素。毫无疑问,寻出这些元素是能够正确快速解题的一个先决条件。
2、注意作者的议论和抒情:
高考英语阅读理解故事类文章常伴随着作者思想情感的流露和表达,因此议论和抒情往往夹杂其中。行文时或按事情发生发展的先后时间进行或按事情发生发展的地点来转换,也可能按事情发展的阶段来布局。在引出话题,讲完一件事情后,作者往往会表达个人感悟或提出建议等。这些体现作者观点或思想的语句在阅读时可以划线,它们往往体现文章中心或者写作意图,属于必考点,所以要仔细体会。
3、结合前两点归纳文章中心,把握作者态度:
故事类文章是通过记叙一件事来表达中心思想的,它是文章的灵魂。归纳文章中心思想时,尤其要分析文章的结尾,因为很多文章卒章显志,用简短的议论、抒情揭示文章中心;文章中议论抒情的句子往往与中心密切相关;也有的文章需要在结合概括各段大意的基础上归纳中心。另外,叙述一件事必有其目的,或阐明某一观点,或赞美某种品德,或抨击某种陋习,这就要求我们在阅读时,通过对细节(第1点中的六要素)的理解,把握作者的态度。
4、有章有据进行解题判断:
分析文章,归纳主题,属于分析、概括、综合的表述能力的考查。切忌脱离文章,架空分析,一定让分析在文章中有依据。