返回

高中三年级英语

首页
  • 阅读理解
    阅读理解。
    Six years ago, a Miami woman walking through the hall of an office building casually noticed
    two men standing together. Several minutes after her leaving, the men murdered a person working
    in the building. Police investigators determined that the woman was the only witness who had seen
    the two suspects, and could possibly describe them. In an interview with police, her memory of the
    men proved disappointingly unclear.
    Several days later, psychologist Ronald P. Fisher was brought in to obtain a more complete
    account from the woman. Fisher’s interview produced a breakthrough-the woman reported a clear
    picture of one of the suspects. She then recalled several details about his appearances. This information
    gave police important leads that enabled them to arrest the suspects and close the case.
    Police investigators sought the help from Fisher because of his rich knowledge in conducting the
    so-called cognitive (认知的) interview, a kind of memory-rebuilding process. In its original form, the
    cognitive interview focuses on guiding witnesses through four general recalling techniques: thinking
    about physical surroundings and personal feelings that existed at the time of past events, reporting
    everything that comes to mind about those events no matter how broken or unconnected, retelling
    events in a variety of time orders, beginning to end, end to beginning, forward or backward, and
    adopting different perspectives while recalling events.
    Usually, an interviewer begins the cognitive approach by encouraging the witness to take an
    active role in recalling information rather than giving answers only to someone else’s questions.
    The witness first describes what happened in his or her own words, with no interviewer interruptions.
    The interviewer then goes further with specific techniques, such as having the witness tell the details
    of what happened from different perspectives.
    Experiments with police detectives trained in this demanding interview method find that they get
    nearly 50% more information from witnesses than before training, while error rates remain about
    the same.
    1. What is the purpose of writing this passage?
    A. To give an account of a murder case in an office
    B. To explain why Fisher was invited to a police interview.
    C. To describe how cognitive method helps the woman to recall.
    D. To give the readers an idea of cognitive interview.
    2. The cognitive interview helped the woman to recall more by ________.
    A. strengthening her memory
    B. giving her encouragement
    C. rebuilding her memory
    D. giving her more time
    3. It can be inferred from the passage that in a cognitive interview, the interviewer mainly plays
    a _______role.
    A. directing
    B. questioning
    C. passive
    D. secondary
    4. What is the key point of the cognitive interview?
    A. The interviewer should interrupt the witness from time to time.
    B. The witness is encouraged to take an active role in recalling information.
    C. The interview should take place outside the police station.
    D. The witness should recall details at the scene of the event.
    5. Police trained in the cognitve interview method can ________.
    A. get more information from the witness than before
    B. decrease the error rate
    C. solve the cases more quickly
    D. use the method more skillfully than the psycholologists
    本题信息:2012年广东省模拟题英语阅读理解难度较难 来源:刘鸿娟
  • 本题答案
    查看答案
本试题 “阅读理解。Six years ago, a Miami woman walking through the hall of an office building casually noticedtwo men standing together. Several minutes af...” 主要考查您对

故事类阅读

等考点的理解。关于这些考点您可以点击下面的选项卡查看详细档案。
  • 故事类阅读

故事类阅读概念:

这类文章一般描述的是某一件具体事情的发生发展或结局,有人物、时间、地点和事件。命题往往从故事的情节、人物或事件的之间的关系、作者的态度及意图、故事前因和后果的推测等方面着手,考查学生对细节的辨认能力以及推理判断能力。


故事类阅读应试技巧:

1、抓住文章的6个要素:
阅读时要学会从事情本身的发展去理解故事情节而不要只看事件在文中出现的先后顺序。因此,无论是顺叙还是倒叙,阅读此类文章时,必须要找到它结构中的5个W(when, where, who, why, what)和1个H(how),不过不是每篇都会完整地交待六个要素。毫无疑问,寻出这些元素是能够正确快速解题的一个先决条件。
2、注意作者的议论和抒情:
高考英语阅读理解故事类文章常伴随着作者思想情感的流露和表达,因此议论和抒情往往夹杂其中。行文时或按事情发生发展的先后时间进行或按事情发生发展的地点来转换,也可能按事情发展的阶段来布局。在引出话题,讲完一件事情后,作者往往会表达个人感悟或提出建议等。这些体现作者观点或思想的语句在阅读时可以划线,它们往往体现文章中心或者写作意图,属于必考点,所以要仔细体会。
3、结合前两点归纳文章中心,把握作者态度:
故事类文章是通过记叙一件事来表达中心思想的,它是文章的灵魂。归纳文章中心思想时,尤其要分析文章的结尾,因为很多文章卒章显志,用简短的议论、抒情揭示文章中心;文章中议论抒情的句子往往与中心密切相关;也有的文章需要在结合概括各段大意的基础上归纳中心。另外,叙述一件事必有其目的,或阐明某一观点,或赞美某种品德,或抨击某种陋习,这就要求我们在阅读时,通过对细节(第1点中的六要素)的理解,把握作者的态度。
4、有章有据进行解题判断:
分析文章,归纳主题,属于分析、概括、综合的表述能力的考查。切忌脱离文章,架空分析,一定让分析在文章中有依据。