返回

高中三年级英语

首页
  • 阅读理解
    阅读理解。
    Illegal removal of coral (珊瑚) along Sri Lanka's coastline increased the amount of destruction on the
    island by last December's tsunami, say researchers.
    Harindra Fernando, a fluid dynamicist (力学家) at Arizona State University in Tempe, made the connection
    after a visit to his native Sri Lanka earlier this year. While serving as a scientific expert and translator for a
    BBC-documentary team, he chatted with locals who said they saw the tsunami turn sideways when it hit
    coral-which would have made it less powerful than in coral-free areas. Fernando linked this to trucks he had
    seen last year carrying piles of coral away from the sea.
    Using the eyewitness reports, estimates (估算) of wave heights, and a series of divers to check the
    presence or absence of corals, Fernando and his colleagues produced a map of coral gaps and wave flooding
    along Sri Lanka's southwest coast.
    The tsunami reached significantly farther inland through the gaps: in one instance, the water traveled 1.5
    kilometres long and knocked a passenger train off its tracks, killing 1,700. But only a few kilometers away,
    where the coral was still undamaged, the wave travelled just 50 metres inland and caused no deaths.
    There is a similar phenomenon. In Nicaragua in 1992, a tsunami poured through a break in the coral reef
    made to let boats through. "Within this passage, water went one kilometre inland," says Fernando. "But
    nearby, where the coral was undamaged, there were still beach umbrellas standing."
    In Sri Lanka, coral is illegally mined to provide souvenirs for tourists, or to be used in house paint. Coral
    harvesters sometimes blow it up with dynamite (炸药) in order to collect fish at the same time. Often, the
    reefs in the best shape are those in front of hotels, as the hotel owners maintain them for the tourists.
    Fernando hopes that his findings will encourage the Sri Lankan government to enforce (实施) its laws against
    coral mining.
    1. Harindra Fernando did all the following EXCEPT ______.

    [     ]


    A. serving as a translator for a BBC-documentary team
    B. helping the Sri Lankan government enforce its laws against coral mining
    C. producing a map of coral gaps along Sri Lanka's southwest coast
    D. linking the coral removal with the destruction of Tsunami
    2. The main idea of Paragraph 5 is that ______.

    [     ]


    A. undamaged coral can greatly decrease tsunami damage
    B. coral-free area is a danger to passenger trains
    C. in general, water travels 30 times farther inland in a coral-free area
    D. it is urgent to enforce laws against coral mining
    3. Which of the following may NOT be the cause of coral gaps?

    [     ]


    A. Boat passages.
    B. Tourists' sightseeing.
    C. Fish collecting.
    D. Tourists' souvenirs.
    4. Which of the following would be the best title for the passage?

    [     ]


    A. Harindra Fernando, a Great Environment Protector
    B. Stop Using Coral as Souvenirs
    C. Coral Cried "Help! Help!"
    D. Coral Mining Enhanced (加剧) Tsunami Damage
    本题信息:2010年0103模拟题英语阅读理解难度极难 来源:张雪
  • 本题答案
    查看答案
本试题 “阅读理解。Illegal removal of coral (珊瑚) along Sri Lanka's coastline increased the amount of destruction on theisland by last December's tsunami, ...” 主要考查您对

健康环保类阅读

等考点的理解。关于这些考点您可以点击下面的选项卡查看详细档案。
  • 健康环保类阅读

健康环保累阅读概念:

健康环保类文章常是介绍科学知识、生活常识和环境保护方面的短文。体裁有记叙文、 说明文、议论文和各种应用文。


健康环保类文章阅读技巧:

       健康环保类文章常是介绍科学知识、生活常识和环境保护方面的短文。阅读此类短文要以现象或事物为中心进行思考,理解现象产生的原因、条件和客观规律等。同时要抓住事物的特征、用途和相互关系等。科普环保类文章一般为说明文,从结构上看大致可分为三个部分:
       第一部分一般是文章的首段,主要用来提出文章的主题,即文章想要阐述、说明的主要内容;
       第二部分是文章的主体,可由若干个段落组成,对文章的主题进行展开说明;
       第三部分是结尾段,对文章的主题进行归纳总结。这类文章多用一般现在时,而且一般多使用客观性词语表述。有时为了强调客观性,也常使用被动语态。
       从近几年的考试题来看,科普环保类的文章越来越与人们的实际生活相接近。由于此类文章缺乏故事情节,很多同学对此类文章感到费解。但一般的科普类文章都是就事论事,需要逻辑推理和想象的时候较少,因此此类阅读题也没有同学们想象中的那么难,只要多加训练,就能较好地答题。
【阅读策略】
1、概要(Summarizing):
      阅完材料后,将所阅材料浓缩,摘要,做出所阅材料的书面或口头梗概。
2、组织(Organization):
      阅读后根据阅读内容,识别观点、人物、事件之间的关系以及文章的结构关系。如:时间关系、比较或对比关系、相关关系及因果关系等。